For the record, establishing facts against convenient bigotry perpetuated about the French and France during WWII, published no less than by the
'Information & Education Division' of the US Occupation Forces, published in Paris in 1945
Foreword:by the original authors/editors
AMERICANS believe in the right to criticize. We defend our right to "beef" or "gripe" or "sound off". We insist upon the right to express our own opinions.
But we also believe in the right of others to express their opinions. For the right to speak involves the duty to listen. The right to criticize involves the responsibility of giving "the other side" a fair chance to make its point. We know that the truth can only be found through open and honest discussion, and that the common good is served through common attempts to reach common understanding. In one way, Democracy is the long and sometimes difficult effort which free men make to understand each other.
This booklet tries to help some of us understand an ally - the French. It is not meant either to "defend" the French or to chastise those Americans who do not like the French. It is intended simply to bring into reasonable focus those irritations, dissatisfactions and misunderstandings which arise because it is often hard for the people of one country to understand the people of another.
The booklet uses the Question-Answer form. It lists the criticisms, misconceptions and ordinary "gripes" which American troops in Europe express most frequently when they talk about the French. Each comment, or question, is followed by an answer -- or discussion. Some of the answers are quite short, because the question is direct and simple. Some of the answers are quite long, because the "questions" are not questions at all, but indictments which contain complicated and sweeping preconceptions.
The purpose of the present publication is to present facts and judgments which even the well-intentioned may tend to overlook.
There may be those who will consider this booklet a catalogue of (( excuses )) or (( justifications )). To them it can only be said that the truth is not denied by giving it a derogatory label.
There may be others who will seize upon the questions with triumph - ignoring the discussions entirely. That kind of reader will ignore the truth anyway - in whatever form it is offered.
This booklet may not convince those who are hopelessly prejudiced, but it may help to keep others from being infected by the same lamentable virus.
"We came to Europe twice in twenty-five years to save the French."
We didn't come to Europe to save the the French, either in 1917 or in 1944. We didn't come to to Europe to do anyone any favors. We came to Europe because we in America were threatened by a hostile, aggressive and very dangerous power.
In this war, France fell in June of 1940. We didn't invade Europe until June of 1944. We didn't even think of "saving the French" through military action until after Pearl Harbor - after the Germans declared war on us. We came to Europe, in two wars, because it was better to fight our enemy in Europe than in America. Would it have been smarter to fight the Battle of the Bulge in Ohio? Would it have been smarter if D-Day had meant a hop across the Atlantic Ocean, instead of the English Channel, in order to get at an enemy sending rocket bombs into our homes? Would it have been smart to wait in America until V bombs, buzz bombs, rocket bombs, and - perhaps - atomic bombs had made shambles of our cities? Even the kids in Germany sang this song: "Today Germany, tomorrow the world." We were a part of that world. We were marked for conquest.
When France fell, our last defense on the Continent was gone. France was the "keystone of freedom" on land from the Mediterranean to the North Sea; it was a bulwark against German aggression. France guarded the Atlantic, and the bases the Germans needed on the Atlantic for submarine and air warfare.
American security and American foreign policy have always rested on this hard fact: we cannot permit a hostile power on the Atlantic Ocean. We can not be secure if we are threatened on the Atlantic. That's why we went to war in 1917; that's why we had to fight in 1944. And that's why, as a matter of common sense and the national interest, President Roosevelt declared (November 11, 1941): "The defense of any territory under the control of the French Volunteer Forces (the Free French) is vital to the defense of the United States."
They did. They helped us out of one of the greatest jams we were ever in. During the American revolution, when almost the entire world stood by in "non intervention" or was against us, it was France who was our greatest ally and benefactor. France loaned the thirteen states $6,000,000 - and gave us over $3,000,000 more. (That was a lot more money in those days than it is now.)
45,000 Frenchmen volunteered in the army of George Washington. - Thev crossed the Atlantic Ocean in small boats that took two months to make the voyage.
Washington's army had no military engineers; it was French engineers who designed and built our fortifications.
The name of Lafayette is one that Americans will never forget, and the French are as proud of that name as we are.
You can judge the measure and meaning of French aid to our Revolution from the letter George Washington sent on April 9, 1781 to our military envoy in Paris, asking for help from France: "We are at this hour suspended in the balance; not from choice but from hard and absolute necessity... Our troops are fast approaching nakedness... our hospitals are without medicines and our sick without nutrition... in a word, we are at the end of our tether, and... now or never our deliverance must come."
It was France that came to our aid in our darkest hour.
"The French act has if they won the war single-handed."
Those who do are damned fools. The French did not win this war single-handed. Neither did we. Neither did the Russians or the British or the Chinese.
If you want to form your own opinion about how much French did to help win the war, ask yourself these questions: Suppose the French army and navy had joined up with the Germans in 1940 (as Hitler tried to get them to do)? Suppose the French armies which were fighting the Germans or the Italians had been fighting us? Suppose there had been no French underground, no French resistance, no French sabotage of German military production, no French espionage for SHAEF, no French guerrillas behind the German lines, no French Maquis in Central France, no FFI inside France as we fought our way through? How many more American lives do you think we would have lost?
"The French brag a lot about the fighting they did, but you don't hear any Americans passing out bouquets to them."
General Patton cabled General Koenig, the French commander of the FFI, that the spectacular advance of his (Patton's) army across France would have been impossible without the fighting aid of the FFI.
General Patch estimated that from the time of the Mediterranean landings to the arrival of our troops at Dijon, the help given to our operations by the FFI was equivalent to four full divisions.
The Maquis who defended the Massif Central, in the south-central part of France, had two Nazi divisions stymied; they kept those two divisions from fighting against us.
Perhaps some of us don't like to pass out bouquets - to anyone but ourselves. Perhaps we have short memories.
"The French were all collaborationists (sic)."
That's the line Goebbels used. The Germans exerted every propaganda effort to make us think there was no real resistance in France. Nazi censorship and Nazi firing squads tried to stop our hearing about the resistance.
"The French mostly collaborated with the Germans."
The Germans would disagree with that. The Germans tried for four years to get more Frenchmen to collaborate. That s why they killed so many hostages. That's why they destroyed 344 communities for "crimes" not connected with military operations.
The Germans overran France in 1940. For two years they used every promise, trick and pressure to induce the French people to work in Germany for the German war machine. They offered workers better food, clothes, privileges and protection denied them in France under occupation rules. And in all of France, during that entire period, about 75,000 French workers enlisted. The Germans admitted the campaign was a failure.
The LVF (Legion Volontaire Francaise), the French volunteer army that the Germans tried to organize, was a gigantic flop.
"After France fell, the French laid down and let the Germans walk all over them. They just waited for us to liberate them. Why didn't they put up a fight?"
Millions of French men, women and children put up a fight that took immense guts, skill and patience.
The Fighting French never stopped fighting - in the RAF North Africa, Italy, and up through France with the US 7th Army.
Here is how the French people inside France fought the Germans after the fall of France:
Perhaps the Germans realized better than we do the relentless fight against them which the French people waged.
An official German report, quoted in the Christian Science Monitor on December 26, 1942, stated sadly: "For systematic inefficiency and criminal carelessness they (the French) are unsurpassed in the history of modern industrial labor".
"We can't rely on these French."
That depends on what you mean by "rely". If you expect the French to react like Americans, you will be disappointed. They are not Americans; they are French. If you expect the French to hurry the way we do, you will be disappointed; the French don't hurry - neither do most of the people in the world outside of America.
But we were able to rely on the French for the most important thing: France fought with us, not against us, twice in the past two decades.
"The French let us down when the fighting got tough. What did they do - as fighters - to help us out?"
Here are a few of the things the French did:
"You wouldn't think they'd even been in the war the way a city like Paris looks."
No, you wouldn't. You can't tell what the war cost France by a stroll down the Champs Elysees, just as you couldn't tell what the war cost America by a walk down the Atlantic City boardwalk.
You can't, in Paris, see the 1,115,000 French men and women and children who died, were wounded, were in concentration camps, or were shot as hostages. You can't see the food and supplies that were taken from France You can't see the 12,551,639,000 man-hours of labor that the Germans took for themselves. You can't see the meagre rations that the French were fed. You can't see the malnutrition that the Germans caused. (70% of the men and 55% of the women in France lost an average of 12% of their weight.)
You can't see the increase (300-400%) in tuberculosis diphtheria, typhoid fever, infantile paralysis. You can't see the number of babies who were born dead because of the food and milk shortages. You don't see rickets on the Champs Elysees.
"We gave the French uniforms, jeeps, trucks, supplies, ammunition - everything."
We didn't give the French these things. We lent them, under Lend-Lease, a 1aw passed by our Congress as "An Act to Promote the Defense of the United States". We lent military equipment and supplies to our ally.
Where else could the French have gotten uniforms, guns, ammunition, supplies ? From the Germans?
A Frenchman aimed with an 03 rifle could kill Germans. It was wiser for us to turn out weapons and uniforms to arm the French than to turn out additional American soldiers.
"We gave the French billions of dollars worth of stuff. They'll never pay it back."
Under Lend-Lease we provided military supplies and equipment to France worth $1,041,000,000.
Under reverse Lend-Lease, the French have already paid back about $450,000,000 - almost half of the amount we lent them in the way of military supplies.
The French paid this $450,000,000 back in the same way that they got it from us - with supplies, materials food, labor, services.
Here are some of the things the French have provided us:
"The French brag a lot about the fighting they did, but you don't hear any Americans passing out bouquets to them."
General Patton cabled General Koenig, the French commander of the FFI, that the spectacular advance of his (Patton's) army across France would have been impossible without the fighting aid of the FFI.
General Patch estimated that from the time of the Mediterranean landings to the arrival of our troops at Dijon, the help given to our operations by the FFI was equivalent to four full divisions.
The Maquis who defended the Massif Central, in the south-central part of France, had two Nazi divisions stymied; they kept those two divisions from fighting against us.
Perhaps some of us don't like to pass out bouquets - to anyone but ourselves. Perhaps we have short memories.
"The French got off pretty easy in the war."
What do you call "pretty easy?" Here is what this war
cost France:
But we also believe in the right of others to express their opinions. For the right to speak involves the duty to listen. The right to criticize involves the responsibility of giving "the other side" a fair chance to make its point. We know that the truth can only be found through open and honest discussion, and that the common good is served through common attempts to reach common understanding. In one way, Democracy is the long and sometimes difficult effort which free men make to understand each other.
This booklet tries to help some of us understand an ally - the French. It is not meant either to "defend" the French or to chastise those Americans who do not like the French. It is intended simply to bring into reasonable focus those irritations, dissatisfactions and misunderstandings which arise because it is often hard for the people of one country to understand the people of another.
The booklet uses the Question-Answer form. It lists the criticisms, misconceptions and ordinary "gripes" which American troops in Europe express most frequently when they talk about the French. Each comment, or question, is followed by an answer -- or discussion. Some of the answers are quite short, because the question is direct and simple. Some of the answers are quite long, because the "questions" are not questions at all, but indictments which contain complicated and sweeping preconceptions.
The purpose of the present publication is to present facts and judgments which even the well-intentioned may tend to overlook.
There may be those who will consider this booklet a catalogue of (( excuses )) or (( justifications )). To them it can only be said that the truth is not denied by giving it a derogatory label.
There may be others who will seize upon the questions with triumph - ignoring the discussions entirely. That kind of reader will ignore the truth anyway - in whatever form it is offered.
This booklet may not convince those who are hopelessly prejudiced, but it may help to keep others from being infected by the same lamentable virus.
oooOooo
"We came to Europe twice in twenty-five years to save the French."
We didn't come to Europe to save the the French, either in 1917 or in 1944. We didn't come to to Europe to do anyone any favors. We came to Europe because we in America were threatened by a hostile, aggressive and very dangerous power.
In this war, France fell in June of 1940. We didn't invade Europe until June of 1944. We didn't even think of "saving the French" through military action until after Pearl Harbor - after the Germans declared war on us. We came to Europe, in two wars, because it was better to fight our enemy in Europe than in America. Would it have been smarter to fight the Battle of the Bulge in Ohio? Would it have been smarter if D-Day had meant a hop across the Atlantic Ocean, instead of the English Channel, in order to get at an enemy sending rocket bombs into our homes? Would it have been smart to wait in America until V bombs, buzz bombs, rocket bombs, and - perhaps - atomic bombs had made shambles of our cities? Even the kids in Germany sang this song: "Today Germany, tomorrow the world." We were a part of that world. We were marked for conquest.
When France fell, our last defense on the Continent was gone. France was the "keystone of freedom" on land from the Mediterranean to the North Sea; it was a bulwark against German aggression. France guarded the Atlantic, and the bases the Germans needed on the Atlantic for submarine and air warfare.
American security and American foreign policy have always rested on this hard fact: we cannot permit a hostile power on the Atlantic Ocean. We can not be secure if we are threatened on the Atlantic. That's why we went to war in 1917; that's why we had to fight in 1944. And that's why, as a matter of common sense and the national interest, President Roosevelt declared (November 11, 1941): "The defense of any territory under the control of the French Volunteer Forces (the Free French) is vital to the defense of the United States."
oooOooo
"We're always pulling the French out of a jam. Did they ever do anything for us?"They did. They helped us out of one of the greatest jams we were ever in. During the American revolution, when almost the entire world stood by in "non intervention" or was against us, it was France who was our greatest ally and benefactor. France loaned the thirteen states $6,000,000 - and gave us over $3,000,000 more. (That was a lot more money in those days than it is now.)
45,000 Frenchmen volunteered in the army of George Washington. - Thev crossed the Atlantic Ocean in small boats that took two months to make the voyage.
Washington's army had no military engineers; it was French engineers who designed and built our fortifications.
The name of Lafayette is one that Americans will never forget, and the French are as proud of that name as we are.
You can judge the measure and meaning of French aid to our Revolution from the letter George Washington sent on April 9, 1781 to our military envoy in Paris, asking for help from France: "We are at this hour suspended in the balance; not from choice but from hard and absolute necessity... Our troops are fast approaching nakedness... our hospitals are without medicines and our sick without nutrition... in a word, we are at the end of our tether, and... now or never our deliverance must come."
It was France that came to our aid in our darkest hour.
oooOooo
"The French act has if they won the war single-handed."
Those who do are damned fools. The French did not win this war single-handed. Neither did we. Neither did the Russians or the British or the Chinese.
If you want to form your own opinion about how much French did to help win the war, ask yourself these questions: Suppose the French army and navy had joined up with the Germans in 1940 (as Hitler tried to get them to do)? Suppose the French armies which were fighting the Germans or the Italians had been fighting us? Suppose there had been no French underground, no French resistance, no French sabotage of German military production, no French espionage for SHAEF, no French guerrillas behind the German lines, no French Maquis in Central France, no FFI inside France as we fought our way through? How many more American lives do you think we would have lost?
oooOooo
"The French brag a lot about the fighting they did, but you don't hear any Americans passing out bouquets to them."
General Patton cabled General Koenig, the French commander of the FFI, that the spectacular advance of his (Patton's) army across France would have been impossible without the fighting aid of the FFI.
General Patch estimated that from the time of the Mediterranean landings to the arrival of our troops at Dijon, the help given to our operations by the FFI was equivalent to four full divisions.
The Maquis who defended the Massif Central, in the south-central part of France, had two Nazi divisions stymied; they kept those two divisions from fighting against us.
Perhaps some of us don't like to pass out bouquets - to anyone but ourselves. Perhaps we have short memories.
oooOooo
"The French were all collaborationists (sic)."
That's the line Goebbels used. The Germans exerted every propaganda effort to make us think there was no real resistance in France. Nazi censorship and Nazi firing squads tried to stop our hearing about the resistance.
oooOooo
"The French mostly collaborated with the Germans."
The Germans would disagree with that. The Germans tried for four years to get more Frenchmen to collaborate. That s why they killed so many hostages. That's why they destroyed 344 communities for "crimes" not connected with military operations.
The Germans overran France in 1940. For two years they used every promise, trick and pressure to induce the French people to work in Germany for the German war machine. They offered workers better food, clothes, privileges and protection denied them in France under occupation rules. And in all of France, during that entire period, about 75,000 French workers enlisted. The Germans admitted the campaign was a failure.
The LVF (Legion Volontaire Francaise), the French volunteer army that the Germans tried to organize, was a gigantic flop.
oooOooo
"After France fell, the French laid down and let the Germans walk all over them. They just waited for us to liberate them. Why didn't they put up a fight?"
Millions of French men, women and children put up a fight that took immense guts, skill and patience.
The Fighting French never stopped fighting - in the RAF North Africa, Italy, and up through France with the US 7th Army.
Here is how the French people inside France fought the Germans after the fall of France:
- They sabotaged production in war plants. They destroyed parts, damaged machinery, slowed down production, changed blue-prints
- They dynamited power plants, warehouses. transmission lines. They wrecked trains. They destroyed bridges. They damaged locomotives.
- They organized armed groups which fought the German police, the Gestapo, the Vichy militia. They executed French collaborationists.
- They acted as a great spy army for SHAEF in London. They transmitted as many as 300 reports a day to SHAEF on German troops' movements, military installations, and the nature and movement of military supplies.
- They got samples of new German weapons and explosive powder to London.
- They ran an elaborate "underground railway" for getting shot-down American and British flyers back to England. They hid, clothed, fed and smuggled out of France over 4,000 American airmen and parachutists (Getting food and clothes isn't easy when you're on a starvation ration yourself. It's risky to forge identification papers). Every American airman rescued meant half a dozen French lives were risked. On an average, one Frenchman was shot every two hours, from 1940 to 1944 by the Germans in an effort to stop French sabotage and assistance to the Allies.
Perhaps the Germans realized better than we do the relentless fight against them which the French people waged.
An official German report, quoted in the Christian Science Monitor on December 26, 1942, stated sadly: "For systematic inefficiency and criminal carelessness they (the French) are unsurpassed in the history of modern industrial labor".
oooOooo
"We can't rely on these French."
That depends on what you mean by "rely". If you expect the French to react like Americans, you will be disappointed. They are not Americans; they are French. If you expect the French to hurry the way we do, you will be disappointed; the French don't hurry - neither do most of the people in the world outside of America.
But we were able to rely on the French for the most important thing: France fought with us, not against us, twice in the past two decades.
oooOooo
"The French let us down when the fighting got tough. What did they do - as fighters - to help us out?"
Here are a few of the things the French did:
- The French fought in Africa, in Sicily, liberated Corsica, fought in Italy, took part in the invasion of Europe and fought through the battles of France and Germany -- from Normandy to Munich.
- Units from the French navy participated in the invasions of Sicily, Italy, Normandy and South France.
- Units of the French navy and merchant marine took part in convoying operations on the Atlantic and Murmansk routes.
- On June 5, 1944, the day before D-Day, over 5,000 Frenchmen of the resistance dynamited railroads in more than 500 strategic places.
- They delayed strategic German troop movements for an average of 48 hours, according to our military experts. Those 48 hours were tactically priceless ; they saved an untold number of American lives.
- French resistance groups blew up a series of bridges in southern France and delayed one of the Wehrmacht's crack units (Das Reich Panzer Division) for twelve days in getting from Bordeaux to Normandy.
- About 30,000 FF1 troups supported the Third Army's VIII Corps in Brittany: they seized and held key spogs ; they conducted extensive guerrilla operations behind the German lines.
- 25,000 FFI troops protected the south flank of the Third Army in its daring dash across France: the FFI wiped out German bridgeheads north of the Loire River ; they guarded vital lines of communication; they wiped out pockets of German resistance; they held many towns and cities under orders from our commmand.
- When our Third Army was approachiung the area between Dijon and Troyes from the west, and while the Seventh Army was approaching this sector from the South, it was the FFI who stubbornly blocked the Germans from making a stand and prevented a mass retirement of German troops.
- In Paris, as our armies drew close, several hundred thousand French men and women rose up against the Germans. 50,000 armed men of the resistance fought and beat the Nazi garrison, and occupied the main buildings and administrative offices of Paris.
oooOooo
"You wouldn't think they'd even been in the war the way a city like Paris looks."
No, you wouldn't. You can't tell what the war cost France by a stroll down the Champs Elysees, just as you couldn't tell what the war cost America by a walk down the Atlantic City boardwalk.
You can't, in Paris, see the 1,115,000 French men and women and children who died, were wounded, were in concentration camps, or were shot as hostages. You can't see the food and supplies that were taken from France You can't see the 12,551,639,000 man-hours of labor that the Germans took for themselves. You can't see the meagre rations that the French were fed. You can't see the malnutrition that the Germans caused. (70% of the men and 55% of the women in France lost an average of 12% of their weight.)
You can't see the increase (300-400%) in tuberculosis diphtheria, typhoid fever, infantile paralysis. You can't see the number of babies who were born dead because of the food and milk shortages. You don't see rickets on the Champs Elysees.
oooOooo
"We gave the French uniforms, jeeps, trucks, supplies, ammunition - everything."
We didn't give the French these things. We lent them, under Lend-Lease, a 1aw passed by our Congress as "An Act to Promote the Defense of the United States". We lent military equipment and supplies to our ally.
Where else could the French have gotten uniforms, guns, ammunition, supplies ? From the Germans?
A Frenchman aimed with an 03 rifle could kill Germans. It was wiser for us to turn out weapons and uniforms to arm the French than to turn out additional American soldiers.
oooOooo
"We gave the French billions of dollars worth of stuff. They'll never pay it back."
Under Lend-Lease we provided military supplies and equipment to France worth $1,041,000,000.
Under reverse Lend-Lease, the French have already paid back about $450,000,000 - almost half of the amount we lent them in the way of military supplies.
The French paid this $450,000,000 back in the same way that they got it from us - with supplies, materials food, labor, services.
Here are some of the things the French have provided us:
- 131,000 snow capes for the winter campaign of 1944.
- 700 tons of rubber tires, made in France.
- 260,000 signs and posters for road markers during the military campaign.
- Millions of jerricans.
- 150,000 French workmen and civilians, working for the United States Army and paid by the French government. These French men and women work at airfields, railway yards, ports, docks, in offices, etc. They range from stevedores to nurses, mechanics to typists, in France, North Africa, and the French islands in the South Pacific, such as New Caledonia, where American troops are stationed.
- All French telephone and telegraph services were placed at our disposal.
- Lumber, cement, gravel for construction purposes.
- Billets -- all through France, from Brest to Strasbourg, from Paris to Nice or Biarritz.
- Theaters such as the Olympia, the Empire, the Marignan in Paris.
- Restaurants - for American mess halls.
- Food - though the French are very short of it themselves.
- The French supply us with such fresh fruit and vegetables as can be spared.
- Beer - made in France, by the French, for American troops, from ingredients shipped from the United States.
- Printing - Stars and Stripes, Yank, Army Talks, Overseas Woman, I and E pamphlets.
oooOooo
"The French brag a lot about the fighting they did, but you don't hear any Americans passing out bouquets to them."
General Patton cabled General Koenig, the French commander of the FFI, that the spectacular advance of his (Patton's) army across France would have been impossible without the fighting aid of the FFI.
General Patch estimated that from the time of the Mediterranean landings to the arrival of our troops at Dijon, the help given to our operations by the FFI was equivalent to four full divisions.
The Maquis who defended the Massif Central, in the south-central part of France, had two Nazi divisions stymied; they kept those two divisions from fighting against us.
Perhaps some of us don't like to pass out bouquets - to anyone but ourselves. Perhaps we have short memories.
oooOooo
"The French got off pretty easy in the war."
What do you call "pretty easy?" Here is what this war
cost France:
Military casualties:
Killed.....200,000
Wounded....230,000
---------
Total......430,000
Civilian casualties:
Killed in bombings..... 60,000
Killed in Battle of France 1940.... 30,000
Killed in other military operations.... 20,000
Shot or massacred in France.... 40,000
Total civilians killed in France..... 150,000
Deportees killed or died in Germany :
Political prisoner.. 130,000
Laborers..... 20,000
Prisoners of War.. 30,000
Total.... 180,000
Total civilians and deportees killed or died.... 330,000
Disabled civilians :
In France... 127,000
Deportees (returned from Germany).... 228,000
Total... 335,000
Total military and civilian killed . . . 530,000
Total . military and civilians killed, wounded, disabled 1,115,000
IN MATERIALS
1,785,000 buildings were destroyed.
5,000 bridges were blown up.
Three-fifths of all French railroad stock was either destroyed or taken to Germany by Germans as they
retreated in 1945.
Half of all the livestock in France was lost or stolen.
Three-fourths of all the agricultural equipment was lost.
12,500,000,000 man-hours of labor, which millions of Frenchmen were forced to perform for the Germans,
were lost to France.
The national debt increased 32 billion dollars.
These figures represent a loss to France of half of her national wealth -- or the total earnings of all Frenchmen,
for two years:Deportees.. 765,000
Forced workers in France.. 850,000
industrial workers in French plants (working for Germany).. 2,500,000
Agricultural workers growing crops for German conscription.. 780,000
Total...... 4,895,000
Hours of work lost to France due to mass deportations.. 7,427,304,000
Hours of work lost to France because of forced labor in France for the Germans..5,124,335,000
Total.. 12,551,639,000
Destruction of buildings, agriculture, Industry, war material etc 2,342,000,000,000
German exchange extortion (setting the franc at 20 francs to the mark,
instead of a the real value - 10 francs to the mark.) 1,832,000,000,000
Pensions to military and civilian dead and disabled 359,000,000
Cash payments to maintain German army of occupation 2,353,480,000,000
Agricultural products taken by Germans or damaged 668,253,000,000
Transport and Communication damaged 1,527,222,000,000
Industry and Commerce requisitioned or damaged 448,474,000,000
Clearing and removal costs 556,580,000,000
War material taken bv Germans or damaged 246,361,000,000
Special charges imposed on France in addition to the direct costs of German occupation...
102,000,000,000
Estimated total money cost to France of the war : 98 billion dollars.
Estimated total cost to U.S. - 300 billion dollars.
France is about one fourteenth the size of the United States.
You can put nearly all of France into Utah and Nevada.
oooOooo
"The French have no courage. Why can't they defend themselves against the Germans ?"
Maybe it would be better to ask, "Why don't the Germans pick on someone their own size ?"
Modern warfare is not simply a matter of courage. A great lightweight can't lick a great heavyweight - even if he has courage to spare.
Hitler threw the manpower and industrial resources of over 80,000,000 Germans against 40,000,000 Frenchmen. The French did not have, and could not have had, the military and industrial power to beat Germany. (For instance, for the past hundred years France has not had enough coal, especially coking coal, to supply her peacetime needs. French iron ore normally flows to Germany's Ruhr valley for smelting, just as the ore of Minnesota goes to the coal and limestone area of Pittsburgh.)
France was beaten by Germany because Germany was enormously superior to France in manpower, equipment, resources, armament, and strategy. Germany had the incalculable advantage of having planned an offensive, Blitzkrieg war - while France, which wanted peace desperately, devoted its energies and training entirely to defensive measures. (That's why they built the Maginot Line.) The few advocates of modern mechanized armies (such as General de Gaulle) were like voices crying out in the wilderness. German propaganda, and "fifth column" activities financed from Berlin, helped to demoralize and confuse a nation that didn't want war in the first place.
The French lost 1,115,000 men and women, military and civilian, in dead, wounded and disabled. That is an enormous loss for a nation of 40 million. (The United States military casualties, up to V-J Day, were about 1,060,000 in dead and wounded.)
oooOooo
"The French don't even have enough men to stand up against the Germans."
True. That, in fact, is one of the things the Germans counted on in 1870, in 1914 and in 1939.
France never fully recovered from the results of World War I. Here is what the French lost from 1914 to 1918:
The catastrophic effects of the first World War hit France particularly hard because they were added to the serious problem of a declining birth-rate. By 1939, largely because of the losses of World War I, the proportion of the French population under 20 years of age was small - and growing smaller ; the proportion of Frenchmen over 60 years of age was large - and growing larger.
In 1940, after occupation, the Germans tried to cripple France permanently by a policy of deliberate starvation and the segregation of the sexes. The Germans held nearly 2,000,000 French men in German prison and work camps - away from French women. The German policy of malnutrition worked so well that in 1945, when the French government was drafting men to re-create a French army, it was found that 40% of all Frenchmen called up for physical duty were physically unfit.
In 1942, at the height of German occupation, there were 500,000 more deaths than births in France.
"The French didn't put up a real fight against the Germans. They just let the Heinies walk in."
No one - least of all the French themselves - will try do deny the enormity of the defeat and the humiliation France suffered in 1940. French military leadership and strategy was tragically inadequate. But this does not mean that the French did not put up a "real fight".
In the six week Battle of France, from May 10 to June 22, 1940, the French lost, in military personnel alone, 260,000 wounded and 108,000 killed. A total of 368,000 casualties in six weeks is not something to pass off lightly.
Yes, the Germans gave the French a terrible beating. But it took the combined strength of the United States, Great Britain, Soviet Russia, Canada, etc., to beat the Germans. It's asking rather a great deal of France to match such strength against hers.
"The leaders of the French resistance were behind the black market. They all got rich on it."
This is the exact argument used by Dr. Goebbels and the German propaganda machine. The Germans wanted to smash the resistance movement; they constantly smeared the leaders of that movement. Goebbels kept hammering at the idea that those who resisted German rule were simply criminals.
The French resistance used the black market during the four years of German occupati6n. They had to use it, in order to survive.
Since the liberation of France, no group in France has more vigorously fought the black market and demanded that the government stop it than the resistance organizations and the resistance leaders.
"The French cleaned out Stuttgart, we saw lots of stuff going back to France - machinery, goods, cattle, supplies, horses, - long convoys of stuff looted from the Germans."
Where had the Germans gotten the stuff ? From France. The long convoys you saw were not "loot": they were authorized reparations, approved by the United States, Great Britain and Russia. The French had a right, under international law, to take back some of the commodities the Germans had stolen from them.
Here are sample figures on what the Germans took out of France:
"In Paris you see hundreds of young Frenchmen, our age, in civilian clothes. Why aren't they all in the Army?"
Many of them are, even though they are in civilian clothes. Reason? In most French commands (including the Paris area), enlisted men are permitted to wear civilian clothes when they are on pass or off duty. French officers in all commands are permitted to wear civilian clothes when off duty.
It is. also worth remembering that in the 1945 draft, the French had to reject 40% of the men called up as physically unfit for military duty (and the standards used were lower than those used in our army.) Why were so many young Frenchmen unfit physically? Because they were underfed by the Germans during the occupation. Because tuberculosis and other diseases spread, during the four years of German occupation. Because of the effects of World War I. Because the best French youth were killed, wounded, disabled, or taken as slave laborers into Germany.
"The French are sloppy-looking soldiers. One look at them and you know they're not good fighters."
You don't tell how an army fights by the way it looks. The Greek soldiers wore funny white skirts -- but they licked the pants off the dashingly dressed Italians, and they put up an amazing fight against the might of the Wehrmacht, the Panzers, and the Luftwaffe.
German officers called American GIs "sloppy," "careless," "undisciplined" soldiers - but it was the Germans who got the shellacking.
The army of George Washington often looked like a ragged mob. Their fighting record is another story.
The French under General Le Clerc fought their war from the heart of Africa to Lake Chad and up to North Africa in an astonishing campaign. No one sneered at their uniforms then.
It might be helpful to remember that many French soldiers had been guerrilla fighters (in the FFI, the Maquis, the resistance). They still dress, act and carry themselves like guerrillas.
"Why don't they get to work and rebuild their country?"
The French Minister of Finance recently reported that France's industries are beginning to operate at 70% of capacity. The rebuilding of France is a tremendous job which will take a long time. Shortages of coal, gasoline, electricity, power, transport, and manpower have made a more rapid recovery impossible.
In 1944, after liberation, France found that of its pre-war transportation, the following were left:
35% of the locomotives,
37% of the freight cars,
38% of the trucks and automobiles,
33% of the merchant marine.
The most important single factor which is holding up French production is the shortage of coal. On February 3, 1945, our Office of War Information analyzed economic conditions in France and pointed out how the coal crisis has plunged France into a vicious circle. Mines could not operate without timber pit props to shore up the ceilings of tunnels in coal veins as they were expanded. But the transportation needed to bring in the timber also needed coal with which to operate.
Coal shortages have caused as many shut-downs of French factories as have the grave shortages of other essential raw materials.
And never forget the loss to France of 1,115,000 people (killed, wounded or disabled) out of a population estimated at around forty million in 1940. This is a staggering blow to the manpower needed for rebuilding.
"The French didn't put up a real fight against the Germans. They just let the Heinies walk in."
No one - least of all the French themselves - will try do deny the enormity of the defeat and the humiliation France suffered in 1940. French military leadership and strategy was tragically inadequate. But this does not mean that the French did not put up a "real fight".
In the six week Battle of France, from May 10 to June 22, 1940, the French lost, in military personnel alone, 260,000 wounded and 108,000 killed. A total of 368,000 casualties in six weeks is not something to pass off lightly.
Yes, the Germans gave the French a terrible beating. But it took the combined strength of the United States, Great Britain, Soviet Russia, Canada, etc., to beat the Germans. It's asking rather a great deal of France to match such strength against hers.
"Why bother about the French? They won't throw any weight in the post-war world."
Apart from reasons of honor and simple decency (Americans are not in the habit of letting their friends down), it is poor politics and worse diplomacy to "write off" a nation of 40 million allies. You may need their help some day.
France still stands as a bastion on the Atlantic, from the Mediterranean to the North Sea. France will still be a strong factor in world political organization. The island bases of France, and her colonies, will still be stra- tegic areas in the world structure of peace. And in the age of the atomic bomb, the physical size and population of a country may be no index of her strengh and potentialities.
Why bother about France? It is not our job to "bother about" France. But it is our job to be seriously concerned about the peace and the political problems of the world. France is very much a part of that world.
David Low, the English cartoonist, once drew a famous cartoon showing the nations in a large rowboat. The European nations were at one end of the boat, which was foundering in the water; Uncle Sam sat in the other end, high and dry and out of the water. And Uncle Sam was saying, "Why should I worry? The leak isn't in my end of the boat" We have paid a terrible price for believing that a leak "at the other end of the boat" does not affect our destiny.
France never fully recovered from the results of World War I. Here is what the French lost from 1914 to 1918:
1,357,800 Killed or diedThe French had mobilized 8,410,000 men. They lost 6,160,800 -- or 73.3% No nation had ever suffered such a staggering loss. No nation had shown a greater record of sheer courage and tenacity. There was scarcely a family in France that did not number one or more of its members among the dead. World War I. left France weak and exhausted - for the second war Germany launched against her within a generation.
4,266,000 Wounded
537,000 Prisoners and missing
Total. 6,160,800
The catastrophic effects of the first World War hit France particularly hard because they were added to the serious problem of a declining birth-rate. By 1939, largely because of the losses of World War I, the proportion of the French population under 20 years of age was small - and growing smaller ; the proportion of Frenchmen over 60 years of age was large - and growing larger.
In 1940, after occupation, the Germans tried to cripple France permanently by a policy of deliberate starvation and the segregation of the sexes. The Germans held nearly 2,000,000 French men in German prison and work camps - away from French women. The German policy of malnutrition worked so well that in 1945, when the French government was drafting men to re-create a French army, it was found that 40% of all Frenchmen called up for physical duty were physically unfit.
In 1942, at the height of German occupation, there were 500,000 more deaths than births in France.
oooOooo
"The French didn't put up a real fight against the Germans. They just let the Heinies walk in."
No one - least of all the French themselves - will try do deny the enormity of the defeat and the humiliation France suffered in 1940. French military leadership and strategy was tragically inadequate. But this does not mean that the French did not put up a "real fight".
In the six week Battle of France, from May 10 to June 22, 1940, the French lost, in military personnel alone, 260,000 wounded and 108,000 killed. A total of 368,000 casualties in six weeks is not something to pass off lightly.
Yes, the Germans gave the French a terrible beating. But it took the combined strength of the United States, Great Britain, Soviet Russia, Canada, etc., to beat the Germans. It's asking rather a great deal of France to match such strength against hers.
oooOooo
"The leaders of the French resistance were behind the black market. They all got rich on it."
This is the exact argument used by Dr. Goebbels and the German propaganda machine. The Germans wanted to smash the resistance movement; they constantly smeared the leaders of that movement. Goebbels kept hammering at the idea that those who resisted German rule were simply criminals.
The French resistance used the black market during the four years of German occupati6n. They had to use it, in order to survive.
Since the liberation of France, no group in France has more vigorously fought the black market and demanded that the government stop it than the resistance organizations and the resistance leaders.
oooOooo
"The French cleaned out Stuttgart, we saw lots of stuff going back to France - machinery, goods, cattle, supplies, horses, - long convoys of stuff looted from the Germans."
Where had the Germans gotten the stuff ? From France. The long convoys you saw were not "loot": they were authorized reparations, approved by the United States, Great Britain and Russia. The French had a right, under international law, to take back some of the commodities the Germans had stolen from them.
Here are sample figures on what the Germans took out of France:
Wheat 2,340,000 metric tonsThe Germans also "requisitioned" or damaged: 668,253,000,000 Francs worth of agricultural products ; 448,474,000,000 Francs worth of industrial and commercial products; 246,361,000,000 Francs worth of war material.
Oats 2,360,000
Hay 1,539,000
Straw 1,870,000
Potatoes 600,000
Fresh fruits 290,000
Cider apples 210,000
Sugar 180,000
Horses 650,000
Eggs 150,000,000 dozen
Wine 190,000,000 gals
Beer 83,000,000
Champagne 16,000,000
Cognac 3,458,000
(1 metric ton equals 2,205 pounds, approximately equal to 1 long ton of 2,240 lbs.)
oooOooo
"In Paris you see hundreds of young Frenchmen, our age, in civilian clothes. Why aren't they all in the Army?"
Many of them are, even though they are in civilian clothes. Reason? In most French commands (including the Paris area), enlisted men are permitted to wear civilian clothes when they are on pass or off duty. French officers in all commands are permitted to wear civilian clothes when off duty.
It is. also worth remembering that in the 1945 draft, the French had to reject 40% of the men called up as physically unfit for military duty (and the standards used were lower than those used in our army.) Why were so many young Frenchmen unfit physically? Because they were underfed by the Germans during the occupation. Because tuberculosis and other diseases spread, during the four years of German occupation. Because of the effects of World War I. Because the best French youth were killed, wounded, disabled, or taken as slave laborers into Germany.
oooOooo
"The French are sloppy-looking soldiers. One look at them and you know they're not good fighters."
You don't tell how an army fights by the way it looks. The Greek soldiers wore funny white skirts -- but they licked the pants off the dashingly dressed Italians, and they put up an amazing fight against the might of the Wehrmacht, the Panzers, and the Luftwaffe.
German officers called American GIs "sloppy," "careless," "undisciplined" soldiers - but it was the Germans who got the shellacking.
The army of George Washington often looked like a ragged mob. Their fighting record is another story.
The French under General Le Clerc fought their war from the heart of Africa to Lake Chad and up to North Africa in an astonishing campaign. No one sneered at their uniforms then.
It might be helpful to remember that many French soldiers had been guerrilla fighters (in the FFI, the Maquis, the resistance). They still dress, act and carry themselves like guerrillas.
oooOooo
"Why don't they get to work and rebuild their country?"
The French Minister of Finance recently reported that France's industries are beginning to operate at 70% of capacity. The rebuilding of France is a tremendous job which will take a long time. Shortages of coal, gasoline, electricity, power, transport, and manpower have made a more rapid recovery impossible.
In 1944, after liberation, France found that of its pre-war transportation, the following were left:
35% of the locomotives,
37% of the freight cars,
38% of the trucks and automobiles,
33% of the merchant marine.
The most important single factor which is holding up French production is the shortage of coal. On February 3, 1945, our Office of War Information analyzed economic conditions in France and pointed out how the coal crisis has plunged France into a vicious circle. Mines could not operate without timber pit props to shore up the ceilings of tunnels in coal veins as they were expanded. But the transportation needed to bring in the timber also needed coal with which to operate.
Coal shortages have caused as many shut-downs of French factories as have the grave shortages of other essential raw materials.
And never forget the loss to France of 1,115,000 people (killed, wounded or disabled) out of a population estimated at around forty million in 1940. This is a staggering blow to the manpower needed for rebuilding.
oooOooo
"The French didn't put up a real fight against the Germans. They just let the Heinies walk in."
No one - least of all the French themselves - will try do deny the enormity of the defeat and the humiliation France suffered in 1940. French military leadership and strategy was tragically inadequate. But this does not mean that the French did not put up a "real fight".
In the six week Battle of France, from May 10 to June 22, 1940, the French lost, in military personnel alone, 260,000 wounded and 108,000 killed. A total of 368,000 casualties in six weeks is not something to pass off lightly.
Yes, the Germans gave the French a terrible beating. But it took the combined strength of the United States, Great Britain, Soviet Russia, Canada, etc., to beat the Germans. It's asking rather a great deal of France to match such strength against hers.
oooOooo
"Why bother about the French? They won't throw any weight in the post-war world."
Apart from reasons of honor and simple decency (Americans are not in the habit of letting their friends down), it is poor politics and worse diplomacy to "write off" a nation of 40 million allies. You may need their help some day.
France still stands as a bastion on the Atlantic, from the Mediterranean to the North Sea. France will still be a strong factor in world political organization. The island bases of France, and her colonies, will still be stra- tegic areas in the world structure of peace. And in the age of the atomic bomb, the physical size and population of a country may be no index of her strengh and potentialities.
Why bother about France? It is not our job to "bother about" France. But it is our job to be seriously concerned about the peace and the political problems of the world. France is very much a part of that world.
David Low, the English cartoonist, once drew a famous cartoon showing the nations in a large rowboat. The European nations were at one end of the boat, which was foundering in the water; Uncle Sam sat in the other end, high and dry and out of the water. And Uncle Sam was saying, "Why should I worry? The leak isn't in my end of the boat" We have paid a terrible price for believing that a leak "at the other end of the boat" does not affect our destiny.